|
Quote of the Spectrum
"Time-The-Way; Infinitely & Design Your Purpose!" -Julian Glidden.
Just, what is Time Reckonation? Innovational Almanac Website Built To Reconcile Relationships With God A Research Library To Help Test Affinity & Skill Levels To Help Sustain Alzheimer's A Christianity Involvement Made To Bring People Closer To Interdependency & God |
Prominent Angel Numbers To Direct Civilization |
Passages Prior To Fundamental Creation |
Understanding Your Sense Of Self |
Terminology Prior To Fundamental Creation, Business, & Public Equality |
What All Religions Compiled Actually Say |
"You are a Timed Reckoner & Timed Allocator" |
"You're Your Own Shadow; God's Light" |
"Accept Yourself, & Design Your Purpose" |
What Is Time Reckonation?
Time Reckonation is a an essential Designer's Almanac Motivator Website built to skillfully boost awareness yo Knowledge & Affinity skills constructed to test & bring people closer by means to depict Interdependency through careful Sociology fields of Studies while pointing people to Jesus Christ, endlessly found & cohered by Julian Glidden, foretelling point-to-point that we are Gods', ourselves, while giving accommodating the Holy Spirit as our Creator in Art Depictions to help inspire People to get back to Work & make Life meaningful. It is also a Movement of, relating to, or 'containing of' interpretation for Twilight, such as the fabrication of Light & Darikness, being that People amongst Society can return to the Light through Inception. It may not be a Light that you want to return back to, but it most certainly is something to consider upon debate groups, not to be handled alone, such as Therapy, but more seen in application to Remedy, but in a matter to congregate ones' doing to become more influent in society, not just in reform to determine oneself, but to imply the necessity to work amongst Sanctions, equivalent to Theoretical Coining to help bring amount a new forthcoming inspirational Motivational Movement. The Light describing Jesus Christ & his Salvation Techniques in the Bible are not only influenced to tell of one-side, but also to exploit another. Thus, being the reason to identify an Equality Conspiracy Theory that acts on accordance to the Anti-Christ's foretelling to be that of Erebus, that Nyx's Evil exists in Human Society as of today, but is merely subjected to the Story of Adam & Eve. The Momentum of this Theory surfaces around the fabrication of TIme such as: "Real-Time." It implores reasoning to believe that the individual can subject their Potential through Time Management, being the key to ones' livlihood, displaying hint that Jesus is telling us to become more Interdependent, not Independent. How we live. Indicating that Reconciliation be a means to curing Alzheimer's. Please note, that this Portfolio was in fact inspired by Angel Numbers, starting from Angel Number XIII, in response to Angel Number SEVEN.
How we see things. How we perceive things to be said & true, or untrue, but simply existing, today, not holding grudges to biased & unbiased reasoning, but in fact to give reasoning for Intellectual Intelligence to guaranteed prove that we can all exist for a reason in response to following the Original Doctrine as recorded from the Holy Bible to apply backtracking thought to renounce the sense-of-self to become more acqusitional in the field of study, to prevent negative emotions from branching, as apart to coining, can negative emotions, too, be coined. Hinted theories suggest by the Web Designer display that Jesus was indeed studying Time as an Involvement to advance Human Civilization for Good Intentions, but might've also suffered from a split-personality that may have been the cause to Gods' depictions seen throughout the ideology behind Past, Present, & Future & choice perspectives in what is to be deciphered as: "Livelihood Personifications," that the theory also implies that life's Inventions are Portrayed in Human Society to be of Symbolic Representation to God & Archangels Holy & Unholy Referencing Portrayal, also believing that any other Person referenced in the Bible is a Conspirator to Gods' Big Plan For A Glorious Depicted Salvation that's been hidden right under our noses. Angel Number 1, be Jesus Christ, informing you truly that you are an Angel. I do not believe anymore in Archangels, but I do believe that Significant Art Depictions can be necessary to advance Civilization. This is also meant to coin out Vampirism in the form of what a Fabulist entrails, following in theory to an Emotional Vampire, versing a Time Vampire, that in actuality can become a Fabulist; Time Lord. Just as Job in the Bible clearly states that it is not possible to go overboard in Life to become GREATER than God. You can only be ideal to God, in reference to God, not over.
How we see things. How we perceive things to be said & true, or untrue, but simply existing, today, not holding grudges to biased & unbiased reasoning, but in fact to give reasoning for Intellectual Intelligence to guaranteed prove that we can all exist for a reason in response to following the Original Doctrine as recorded from the Holy Bible to apply backtracking thought to renounce the sense-of-self to become more acqusitional in the field of study, to prevent negative emotions from branching, as apart to coining, can negative emotions, too, be coined. Hinted theories suggest by the Web Designer display that Jesus was indeed studying Time as an Involvement to advance Human Civilization for Good Intentions, but might've also suffered from a split-personality that may have been the cause to Gods' depictions seen throughout the ideology behind Past, Present, & Future & choice perspectives in what is to be deciphered as: "Livelihood Personifications," that the theory also implies that life's Inventions are Portrayed in Human Society to be of Symbolic Representation to God & Archangels Holy & Unholy Referencing Portrayal, also believing that any other Person referenced in the Bible is a Conspirator to Gods' Big Plan For A Glorious Depicted Salvation that's been hidden right under our noses. Angel Number 1, be Jesus Christ, informing you truly that you are an Angel. I do not believe anymore in Archangels, but I do believe that Significant Art Depictions can be necessary to advance Civilization. This is also meant to coin out Vampirism in the form of what a Fabulist entrails, following in theory to an Emotional Vampire, versing a Time Vampire, that in actuality can become a Fabulist; Time Lord. Just as Job in the Bible clearly states that it is not possible to go overboard in Life to become GREATER than God. You can only be ideal to God, in reference to God, not over.
Inspirational Metamorphic Concepts
Time Reckonation branches in major Philosophical resourcing to verify proving bit-by-bit that the Bible is immortally correct in attempts to studying THE Anti-Christ, while explaining the Mind in account to being the only Time Traveling Mechanism in the World. Julian Glidden's Designer Metamorphic Inspiriers are not only of a mass hysteria of collected knowledge upon Fictional Resources, Characters, Anime, Video Gaming, Philosophers, Researchers, & God, but proving bit-by-bit not only of Jesus being the Son of God, but of verifying that those who took into account in Greek Mythology, who've verily shown Midst to render themselves as Gods ties into belief to Passage 1 John 4:15, connecting Living to Folklore, to determine the existence to the Primeval Protogenoi God in effort to opposing a theory that describes connection to ignoring Satanism; going straight into Erebus, verifying Hades' existence. Not only is Jesus Christ the most influential found on the Website, bears significance to Cronus. The creation of Time Reckoner Umlaut, or, to be known by the name of Reckonatra, is in fact inspired from Time that Cronus stood for, but is actually a coining to the Greek God Cronus based on studies from the Theogony of Hesoid that is believed by Julian Glidden to be arbitrarily created from the existence to the Holy Bible as offspring text sources. Just as a loop to all things is prescribed, so are things trapped in the Loop (or the Machine) is verifying that all central life are living amongst all as one in connection to the Adam & Jesus Theory, verifying however, that Astronomy & Anatomy don't see eye-to-eye, therefore contradict each other due to the pronounced theory of Spiritual Fragmentation that verifies that all Gods & People are Jesus Christ in-the-flesh, defining Individuality, proposed in theory by Julian Glidden, just as Synonyms can be determined to outfit terminology to find better results from a Thesaurus.
Debunking Greek Mythology in connection to Nightmare is essentially Eternal Darkness, if you'd prefer. Verifying the second evils in this World. Whereas, with Satanism you have Darkness & Fire, describing the Death Personification in connection to Mandaeism that verifies Gnoticism, debunking Sologamy in connection to Etsy (Adultery), is not Polygamy, but is in fact defining Scizoid's 'Secret Love' is diagnostic to in matching the Death Personlification that connects to Nihilism, that such Personality Disorders can be caused by egosyntonic drugs. What is actually being seen is an Illusion by their Warped Minds in relation to Anorgasmia that what is actually being seen amongst this so-called Self Marriage is Sexual Abstidence built to confuse you. Reseasrched from understanding to Dr. Sam Vaknin's Book describing Malignant Self-Love to being accurately provocative in connection to Public Narcissism, being a Problem, this clearly debunks the Community/Copdependency VS Self/Narcisissm Theory Julian Glidden has established in chained effort to connect an in-depth meaning to establishing the meaning to "friendly togetherness," but is being spun. Studies depict that the two evils share a common ground to Apophatic Theology, involving Kabbalism, but are in fact parallel to each other, but are in fact seperate, somewhat undergoing in life like an open-relationship. This verifies that Gnoticism is in fact the last evil to be described in the Bible, if applied to abrasive uncontrollable behavior that applies to Schizoid Disorder. Schizophrenia is not nearly the same compared to Schizoid. Often times is it questionable to why Omnisexuallity changed its name to Pansexuality? Yerkes-Dodson Law describes just how far Sexuality can go. Evidence supports that Schizoid Personality Disorder can significantly land a mass effect on Men, & non-binary gendered Women. Studies suggest that Schizoid & Schizophrenia Behavior is opposed to warped reality mechanics. From that being said, would teaching the Jesus & Adam Connection help to bring sensibility back into place, or is there really no hope for these kinds of People? Just as you have Light. You have Darkness. Just as that commences, you get this eternal sense for Twilight that proposes Good, but can be outputted as Bad assumption if there's no control involved that actually lessens dexterity level & hygiene. Now you've spotted life's Dogma. Just remember, Chivalry is not Dead. It's just being confused nowadays, which is caused by a Phenomenon called "follies a deux;" a Psychotic Episode explaining non-existent life to be but ONE Deity. |
Debunking Real VS Fake
This Website, however, swerves as an Oath Omentum in accordance to Knowledge Continium for Worldwide Venturers in effort to define the Laws Of Time in Connection to Jesus Christ, verifying that all Religious Involvement are Fragmented in correlation to defining the Soul Conspiracy of Movement that links to the understanding of Prephiral Vision being what debunks possibility to Reincarnation, verifying that behavior mirrors all in which is often seen in terminology, congregating the establishment to Hopes, Dreams, & Nightmare, detesting Memory re-call of Past Life Experiences called Purgatory, that all thinks are cohered in the Fundamentals of Design that explains a Cycle as an Alpha & Omega consort that links to Soul Travels to those who've been, or yet to be encountered in ones' Life. This is called "The Last Phase," like a finalizing choice to where the Soul wishes to proceed, verifying an Infinite never-ending Loop to all trends & value & hidden circumstances when opposed to Living & Non-Living in establishing means to coexistence. Whereas, Change is seen as the Constant. People upon belief who prescribe Visions are often those who could also seen as Reincarnations of Past Established Living Portrayals of People, or perhaps served as Venue to soon-to-be existences. Debunking a lag that clearly defines Real VS Fake, when describing infinite Great Will that is believed to be described in Luke 1:15. Just as Actions differ, such is Selfless VS Selfishness, but what is really ignores these two is Self-Likeness VS Self-Righteousness that formulates a clear meaning to Interdependency.
The Equality Spectrum
Time Reckonation not only provides full-understandment to the growing of proof & verification that something is meant to be seen, but also to debunk Agnosticism in reference to Atheism, verifying that Vindication (Repenting) is necessary for Research devleopment, but naturally to be influenced as Imperators, only to be seen to withhold Positive Affirmations, to deliver Truth through Theory, displaying Compilation to all Religions that tells of an existence to a God; ourselves. The Theory to Time is well-expressed, also involving a more larger-sense to Equality amongst all, not just Business Equality. Realization is what's meant to be seen here, then the growing next step whither one should act upon it, or stay distressed to subject nothing from it is entirely the individuals' choice, but moreover, there are parts in our lives to where things are just undeterminable, & are plainly unseen, that there are connections in the Bible that just aren't being talked about anymore, properly. Theories instate that when given the thought of us all being the Same Soul, it would possibly make things more less complicated to People in Civilization to feel the need to "come out of their Shells," as in, express themselves more openly, once given the state-in-mind to do so, for the Person has every right to voice his or her own Opinion through forms of Free Speech, so long as there isn't anything overly negative to be seen other than providing Evidence to debunk something ingenious.
Freedom Of Religion
Time Reckonation gives rise to most forms to things being said, that all Religions when compiled are embracing a clear meaning that we're simply worshipping ourselves. Not Sexually, giving into Lust & Sin, just as there People today who exist to lie, stand for this concept, but are effortlessly trying to secretly collapse Religion without knowing first-hand to what a Religion entrails through Past-inflected experiences, while theories suggest that People suffer due to Religion, not without Religion, for it holds meaning to Spiritual Indoctrination seen through retaliation. Theories state that things can be displayed for Good & Dark intentions to provide meaning to Angel Code 421, such as the state to being seen to Reconciliation. Many Bibles are displayed on this Site, however, are only seen for Reference provided that these Bibles exist in our Timeframe for a Reason, not necessarily to be casted out, but are often referenced by People who are taking things out of negative perspectives to know what's actually seen instead of explaining what is truly told, thereof, blaming of so-and-so's beliefs' begin. Especially through Catholicism. Anyone should have a right to voice what they belief in; some may be inaccurate, just as those who are saying so, are merely citing information that 'could truly be linked.' Time Reckonation cites accurate Interpretations, given the existence to the Dark Bible & the Evil Bible seen Online that contrast to why Evil is seen today, while telling that the Progressive Society that those talk about are merely dedicated to Newly Translated Bibles that twist the Truth. Theories from Blog Posts & Research seen from Time Reckonation follow deeper.
Life; Yet, Be A Chess Game
|
The Art inspired through Time Reckonation details that life is seen essentially as Speed Chess through depiction to Metaphysics. Namely identifying that life even of itself meets its own ends to be but a formality to express congruent expression to visualize the Truth through the Human Mind, allowing anyone to believe, inherit, & understand. Time Reckonation invokes upon clear studying seen to tell all through Art Depictions that the Philosophy to Space & Time can be knowledgeable & can be inherited to describe sensibility within ourselves, but more importantly reflect amongst Time through clarifying that life is made-up from Past, Present & Future variances of ones' life that makes up for the experiences that enables full-detail expression & belief that once can inherit Future through positioning in life, once the person is set to do more than try through some way to reach into Business Fortification.
|
In contrast to all Religions, & to ancient Greek philosophers who believed that the universe had an infinite past with no beginning, medieval philosophers and theologians developed the concept of the universe having a finite past with a beginning. This view was inspired by the creation belief shared by the three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The Christian philosopher John Philoponus presented another early argument against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past. His views were adopted by many, including, most notably, early Muslim philosopher Al-Kindi (Alkindus), Jewish philosopher Saadia Gaon(Saadia ben Joseph), and Muslim theologian Al-Ghazali (Algazel). They used his two logical arguments against an infinite past, the first being the "argument from the impossibility of the existence of an actual infinite", which states:
"An actual infinite cannot exist.""An infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite.""∴ An infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist."The second argument, the "argument from the impossibility of completing an actual infinite by successive addition", states:
"An actual infinite cannot be completed by successive addition.""The temporal series of past events has been completed by successive addition.""The temporal series of past events cannot be an actual infinite."Both arguments were adopted by later Christian philosophers and theologians, and the second argument in particular became more famous after it was adopted by Immanuel Kant in his thesis of the first antinomy concerning time.
In the early 11th century, the Muslim physicist Ibn al-Haytham (Alhacen or Alhazen) discussed space perception and its epistemological implications in his Book of Optics (1021). His experimental proof of the intromission model of vision led to changes in the understanding of the visual perception of space, contrary to the previous emission theory of vision supported by Euclid and Ptolemy. In "tying the visual perception of space to prior bodily experience, Alhacen unequivocally rejected the intuitiveness of spatial perception and, therefore, the autonomy of vision. Without tangible notions of distance and size for correlation, sight can tell us next to nothing about such things."
Realism & Anti-Realism
A traditional realist position in ontology is that time and space have existence apart from the human mind. Idealists, by contrast, deny or doubt the existence of objects independent of the mind. Some anti-realists, whose ontological position is that objects outside the mind do exist, nevertheless doubt the independent existence of time and space.
In 1788, Immanuel Kant published the Critique of Pure Reason, one of the most influential works in the history of the philosophy of space and time. He describes time as an a priori notion that, together with other a priori notions such as space, allows us to comprehend sense experience. Kant denies that either space or time are substance, entities in themselves, or learned by experience; he holds, rather, that both are elements of a systematic framework we use to structure our experience. Spatial measurements are used to quantify how far apart objects are, and temporal measurements are used to quantitatively compare the interval between (or duration of) events. Although space and time are held to be transcendentally ideal in this sense, they are also empirically real—that is, not mere illusions.
Idealist writers, such as J. M. E. McTaggart in The Unreality of Time, have argued that time is an illusion (see also The flow of time, below).
The writers discussed here are for the most part realists in this regard; for instance, Gottfried Leibniz held that his monads existed, at least independently of the mind of the observer.
Important Figures
The great debate between defining notions of space and time as real objects themselves. Just as Leibniz and Newton conducted their experiments that displayed theories to contradictions in assuming that existence triangulates around absolute knowledge & velocity through arguments & belief. The example Leibniz uses involves two proposed universes situated in absolute space. The only discernible difference between them is that the latter is positioned five feet to the left of the first. The example is only possible if such a thing as absolute space exists. Such a situation, however, is not possible, according to Leibniz, for if it were, a universe's position in absolute space would have no sufficient reason, as it might very well have been anywhere else. Therefore, it contradicts the principle of sufficient reason, and there could exist two distinct universes that were in all ways indiscernible, thus contradicting the identity of indiscernibles. Standing out in Clarke's (and Newton's) response to Leibniz's arguments is the bucket argument: Water in a bucket, hung from a rope and set to spin, will start with a flat surface. As the water begins to spin in the bucket, the surface of the water will become concave. If the bucket is stopped, the water will continue to spin, and while the spin continues, the surface will remain concave. The concave surface is apparently not the result of the interaction of the bucket and the water, since the surface is flat when the bucket first starts to spin, it becomes concave as the water starts to spin, and it remains concave as the bucket stops.In this response, Clarke argues for the necessity of the existence of absolute space to account for phenomena like rotation and acceleration that cannot be accounted for on a purely relationalist account. Clarke argues that since the curvature of the water occurs in the rotating bucket as well as in the stationary bucket containing spinning water, it can only be explained by stating that the water is rotating in relation to the presence of some third thing—absolute space.
Leibniz describes a space that exists only as a relation between objects, and which has no existence apart from the existence of those objects. Motion exists only as a relation between those objects. Newtonian space provided the absolute frame of reference within which objects can have motion. In Newton's system, the frame of reference exists independently of the objects contained within it. These objects can be described as moving in relation to space itself. For many centuries, the evidence of a concave water surface held authority.
Leibniz describes a space that exists only as a relation between objects, and which has no existence apart from the existence of those objects. Motion exists only as a relation between those objects. Newtonian space provided the absolute frame of reference within which objects can have motion. In Newton's system, the frame of reference exists independently of the objects contained within it. These objects can be described as moving in relation to space itself. For many centuries, the evidence of a concave water surface held authority.
Then came another important figure in the debate in the 19th-century; physicist Ernst Mach. While he did not deny the existence of phenomena like that seen in the bucket argument, he still denied the absolutist conclusion by offering a different answer as to what the bucket was rotating in relation to: the fixed stars.
Mach suggested that thought experiments like the bucket argument are problematic. If we were to imagine a universe that only contains a bucket, on Newton's account, this bucket could be set to spin relative to absolute space, and the water it contained would form the characteristic concave surface. But in the absence of anything else in the universe, it would be difficult to confirm that the bucket was indeed spinning. It seems equally possible that the surface of the water in the bucket would remain flat.
Mach argued that, in effect, the water experiment in an otherwise empty universe would remain flat. But if another object were introduced into this universe, perhaps a distant star, there would now be something relative to which the bucket could be seen as rotating. The water inside the bucket could possibly have a slight curve. To account for the curve that we observe, an increase in the number of objects in the universe also increases the curvature in the water. Mach argued that the momentum of an object, whether angular or linear, exists as a result of the sum of the effects of other objects in the universe.
Albert Einstein proposed that the laws of physics should be based on the principle of relativity. This principle holds that the rules of physics must be the same for all observers, regardless of the frame of reference that is used, and that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. This theory was motivated by Maxwell's equations, which show that electromagnetic waves propagate in a vacuum at the speed of light. However, Maxwell's equations give no indication of what this speed is relative to. Prior to Einstein, it was thought that this speed was relative to a fixed medium, called theluminiferous ether. In contrast, the theory of special relativity postulates that light propagates at the speed of light in all inertial frames, and examines the implications of this postulate.
All attempts to measure any speed relative to this ether failed, which can be seen as a confirmation of Einstein's postulate that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. Special relativityis a formalization of the principle of relativity that does not contain a privileged inertial frame of reference, such as the luminiferous ether or absolute space, from which Einstein inferred that no such frame exists.
Einstein generalized relativity to frames of reference that were non-inertial. He achieved this by positing the Equivalence Principle, which states that the force felt by an observer in a given gravitational field and that felt by an observer in an accelerating frame of reference are indistinguishable. This led to the conclusion that the mass of an object warps the geometry of the space-time surrounding it, as described in Einstein's field equations.
In classical physics, an inertial reference frame is one in which an object that experiences no forces does not accelerate. In general relativity, an inertial frame of reference is one that is following a geodesicof space-time. An object that moves against a geodesic experiences a force. An object in free fall does not experience a force, because it is following a geodesic. An object standing on the earth, however, will experience a force, as it is being held against the geodesic by the surface of the planet. In light of this, the bucket of water rotating in empty space will experience a force because it rotates with respect to the geodesic. The water will become concave, not because it is rotating with respect to the distant stars, but because it is rotating with respect to the geodesic.
Einstein partially advocates Mach's principle in that distant stars explain inertia because they provide the gravitational field against which acceleration and inertia occur. But contrary to Leibniz's account, this warped space-time is as integral a part of an object as are its other defining characteristics, such as volume and mass. If one holds, contrary to idealist beliefs, that objects exist independently of the mind, it seems that relativistics commits them to also hold that space and temporality have exactly the same type of independent existence.
Mach suggested that thought experiments like the bucket argument are problematic. If we were to imagine a universe that only contains a bucket, on Newton's account, this bucket could be set to spin relative to absolute space, and the water it contained would form the characteristic concave surface. But in the absence of anything else in the universe, it would be difficult to confirm that the bucket was indeed spinning. It seems equally possible that the surface of the water in the bucket would remain flat.
Mach argued that, in effect, the water experiment in an otherwise empty universe would remain flat. But if another object were introduced into this universe, perhaps a distant star, there would now be something relative to which the bucket could be seen as rotating. The water inside the bucket could possibly have a slight curve. To account for the curve that we observe, an increase in the number of objects in the universe also increases the curvature in the water. Mach argued that the momentum of an object, whether angular or linear, exists as a result of the sum of the effects of other objects in the universe.
Albert Einstein proposed that the laws of physics should be based on the principle of relativity. This principle holds that the rules of physics must be the same for all observers, regardless of the frame of reference that is used, and that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. This theory was motivated by Maxwell's equations, which show that electromagnetic waves propagate in a vacuum at the speed of light. However, Maxwell's equations give no indication of what this speed is relative to. Prior to Einstein, it was thought that this speed was relative to a fixed medium, called theluminiferous ether. In contrast, the theory of special relativity postulates that light propagates at the speed of light in all inertial frames, and examines the implications of this postulate.
All attempts to measure any speed relative to this ether failed, which can be seen as a confirmation of Einstein's postulate that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. Special relativityis a formalization of the principle of relativity that does not contain a privileged inertial frame of reference, such as the luminiferous ether or absolute space, from which Einstein inferred that no such frame exists.
Einstein generalized relativity to frames of reference that were non-inertial. He achieved this by positing the Equivalence Principle, which states that the force felt by an observer in a given gravitational field and that felt by an observer in an accelerating frame of reference are indistinguishable. This led to the conclusion that the mass of an object warps the geometry of the space-time surrounding it, as described in Einstein's field equations.
In classical physics, an inertial reference frame is one in which an object that experiences no forces does not accelerate. In general relativity, an inertial frame of reference is one that is following a geodesicof space-time. An object that moves against a geodesic experiences a force. An object in free fall does not experience a force, because it is following a geodesic. An object standing on the earth, however, will experience a force, as it is being held against the geodesic by the surface of the planet. In light of this, the bucket of water rotating in empty space will experience a force because it rotates with respect to the geodesic. The water will become concave, not because it is rotating with respect to the distant stars, but because it is rotating with respect to the geodesic.
Einstein partially advocates Mach's principle in that distant stars explain inertia because they provide the gravitational field against which acceleration and inertia occur. But contrary to Leibniz's account, this warped space-time is as integral a part of an object as are its other defining characteristics, such as volume and mass. If one holds, contrary to idealist beliefs, that objects exist independently of the mind, it seems that relativistics commits them to also hold that space and temporality have exactly the same type of independent existence.
Conventionalism
The position of conventionalism states that there is no fact of the matter as to the geometry of space and time, but that it is decided by convention. The first proponent of such a view, Henri Poincaré, reacting to the creation of the new non-Euclidean geometry, argued that which geometry applied to a space was decided by convention, since different geometries will describe a set of objects equally well, based on considerations from his sphere-world.
This view was developed and updated to include considerations from relativistic physics by Hans Reichenbach. Reichenbach's conventionalism, applying to space and time, focuses around the idea ofcoordinative definition.
Coordinative definition has two major features. The first has to do with coordinating units of length with certain physical objects. This is motivated by the fact that we can never directly apprehend length. Instead we must choose some physical object, say the Standard Metre at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (International Bureau of Weights and Measures), or the wavelength of cadmium to stand in as our unit of length. The second feature deals with separated objects. Although we can, presumably, directly test the equality of length of two measuring rods when they are next to one another, we can not find out as much for two rods distant from one another. Even supposing that two rods, whenever brought near to one another are seen to be equal in length, we are not justified in stating that they are always equal in length. This impossibility undermines our ability to decide the equality of length of two distant objects. Sameness of length, to the contrary, must be set by definition. Such a use of coordinative definition is in effect, on Reichenbach's conventionalism, in the General Theory of Relativity where light is assumed, i.e. not discovered, to mark out equal distances in equal times. After this setting of coordinative definition, however, the geometry of spacetime is set.
As in the absolutism/relationalism debate, contemporary philosophy is still in disagreement as to the correctness of the conventionalist doctrine. While conventionalism still holds many proponents, cutting criticisms concerning the coherence of Reichenbach's doctrine of coordinative definition have led many to see the conventionalist view as untenable.
The Structure of Spacetime
Building from a mix of insights from the historical debates of absolutism and conventionalism as well as reflecting on the import of the technical apparatus of the General Theory of Relativity, details as to the structure of spacetime have made up a large proportion of discussion within the philosophy of space and time, as well as the philosophy of physics. The following is a short list of topics.
According to special relativity each point in the universe can have a different set of events that compose its present instant. This has been used in the Rietdijk–Putnam argument to demonstrate that relativity predicts a block universe in which events are fixed in four dimensions.
Religious Frameworks
My Research entrails that our Research that we are learning ourselves are indeed researched first before People who existed to be called as Gods, to be classified through their interpretational biographies known to their existences that they stand in first-person over what's been said & researched by backed Scientists, giving the belief to what a Persona can also hold understanding to through symbolic portrayal.
Codependency vs Narcissism
Research depicts that the World, based on Relations & Value-ship is on the verge to Codependency (Community) vs Narcissism (Self).
Explaining why Chivalry is seen to be dead by many, these days, while calculating intensive studying that Irony is somewhat involved.
Explaining why Chivalry is seen to be dead by many, these days, while calculating intensive studying that Irony is somewhat involved.
The Movement Of Time
The problem of the direction of time arises directly from two contradictory facts. Firstly, the fundamental physical laws are time-reversal invariant; if a cinematographic film were taken of any process describable by means of the aforementioned laws and then played backwards, it would still portray a physically possible process. Secondly, our experience of time, at the macroscopic level, is not time-reversal invariant. Glasses fall and break, however shards of glass cannot reassemble and fly up onto tables. We have memories of the past, and none of the future. We feel we can't change the past but can influence the future.
One solution to this problem takes a metaphysical view, in which the direction of time follows from an asymmetry of causation. We know more about the past because the elements of the past are causes for the effect that is our perception. We feel we can't affect the past and can affect the future because we can't affect the past and can affect the future.
There are two main objections to this view. First is the problem of distinguishing the cause from the effect in a non-arbitrary way. The use of causation in constructing a temporal ordering could easily become circular. The second problem with this view is its explanatory power. While the causation account, if successful, may account for some time-asymmetric phenomena like perception and action, it does not account for many others.
However, asymmetry of causation can be observed in a non-arbitrary way which is not metaphysical in the case of a human hand dropping a cup of water which smashes into fragments on a hard floor, spilling the liquid. In this order, the causes of the resultant pattern of cup fragments and water spill is easily attributable in terms of the trajectory of the cup, irregularities in its structure, angle of its impact on the floor, etc. However, applying the same event in reverse, it is difficult to explain why the various pieces of the cup should fly up into the human hand and reassemble precisely into the shape of a cup, or why the water should position itself entirely within the cup. The causes of the resultant structure and shape of the cup and the encapsulation of the water by the hand within the cup are not easily attributable, as neither hand nor floor can achieve such formations of the cup or water. This asymmetry is perceivable on account of two features: i) the relationship between the agent capacities of the human hand (i.e., what it is and is not capable of and what it is for) and non-animal agency (i.e., what floors are and are not capable of and what they are for) and ii) that the pieces of cup came to possess exactly the nature and number of those of a cup before assembling. In short, such asymmetry is attributable to the relationship between temporal direction on the one hand and the implications of form and functional capacity on the other.
The application of these ideas of form and functional capacity only dictates temporal direction in relation to complex scenarios involving specific, non-metaphysical agency which is not merely dependent on human perception of time. However, this last observation in itself is not sufficient to invalidate the implications of the example for the progressive nature of time in general.
The second major family of solutions to this problem, and by far the one that has generated the most literature, finds the existence of the direction of time as relating to the nature of thermodynamics.
The answer from classical thermodynamics states that while our basic physical theory is, in fact, time-reversal symmetric, thermodynamics is not. In particular, the second law of thermodynamics states that the net entropy of a closed system never decreases, and this explains why we often see glass breaking, but not coming back together.
But in statistical mechanics things get more complicated. On one hand, statistical mechanics is far superior to classical thermodynamics, in that thermodynamic behavior, such as glass breaking, can be explained by the fundamental laws of physics paired with a statistical postulate. But statistical mechanics, unlike classical thermodynamics, is time-reversal symmetric. The second law of thermodynamics, as it arises in statistical mechanics, merely states that it is overwhelmingly likely that net entropy will increase, but it is not an absolute law.
Current thermodynamic solutions to the problem of the direction of time aim to find some further fact, or feature of the laws of nature to account for this discrepancy.
A third type of solution to the problem of the direction of time, although much less represented, argues that the laws are not time-reversal symmetric. For example, certain processes in quantum mechanics, relating to the weak nuclear force, are not time-reversible, keeping in mind that when dealing with quantum mechanics time-reversibility comprises a more complex definition. But this type of solution is insufficient because 1) the time-asymmetric phenomena in quantum mechanics are too few to account for the uniformity of macroscopic time-asymmetry and 2) it relies on the assumption that quantum mechanics is the final or correct description of physical processes.[citation needed]
One recent proponent of the laws solution is Tim Maudlin who argues that the fundamental laws of physics are laws of temporal evolution (see Maudlin [2007]). However, elsewhere Maudlin argues: "[the] passage of time is an intrinsic asymmetry in the temporal structure of the world... It is the asymmetry that grounds the distinction between sequences that runs from past to future and sequences which run from future to past" [ibid, 2010 edition, p. 108]. Thus it is arguably difficult to assess whether Maudlin is suggesting that the direction of time is a consequence of the laws or is itself primitive.
The problem of the flow of time, as it has been treated in analytic philosophy, owes its beginning to a paper written by J. M. E. McTaggart. In this paper McTaggart proposes two "temporal series". The first series, which means to account for our intuitions about temporal becoming, or the moving Now, is called the A-series. The A-series orders events according to their being in the past, present or future,simpliciter and in comparison to each other. The B-series eliminates all reference to the present, and the associated temporal modalities of past and future, and orders all events by the temporal relationsearlier than and later than.
McTaggart, in his paper "The Unreality of Time", argues that time is unreal since a) the A-series is inconsistent and b) the B-series alone cannot account for the nature of time as the A-series describes an essential feature of it.
Building from this framework, two camps of solution have been offered. The first, the A-theorist solution, takes becoming as the central feature of time, and tries to construct the B-series from the A-series by offering an account of how B-facts come to be out of A-facts. The second camp, the B-theorist solution, takes as decisive McTaggart's arguments against the A-series and tries to construct the A-series out of the B-series, for example, by temporal indexicals.
The Quantum field theory models have shown that it is possible for theories in two different spacetime backgrounds, like AdS/CFT or T-duality, to be equivalent.
One solution to this problem takes a metaphysical view, in which the direction of time follows from an asymmetry of causation. We know more about the past because the elements of the past are causes for the effect that is our perception. We feel we can't affect the past and can affect the future because we can't affect the past and can affect the future.
There are two main objections to this view. First is the problem of distinguishing the cause from the effect in a non-arbitrary way. The use of causation in constructing a temporal ordering could easily become circular. The second problem with this view is its explanatory power. While the causation account, if successful, may account for some time-asymmetric phenomena like perception and action, it does not account for many others.
However, asymmetry of causation can be observed in a non-arbitrary way which is not metaphysical in the case of a human hand dropping a cup of water which smashes into fragments on a hard floor, spilling the liquid. In this order, the causes of the resultant pattern of cup fragments and water spill is easily attributable in terms of the trajectory of the cup, irregularities in its structure, angle of its impact on the floor, etc. However, applying the same event in reverse, it is difficult to explain why the various pieces of the cup should fly up into the human hand and reassemble precisely into the shape of a cup, or why the water should position itself entirely within the cup. The causes of the resultant structure and shape of the cup and the encapsulation of the water by the hand within the cup are not easily attributable, as neither hand nor floor can achieve such formations of the cup or water. This asymmetry is perceivable on account of two features: i) the relationship between the agent capacities of the human hand (i.e., what it is and is not capable of and what it is for) and non-animal agency (i.e., what floors are and are not capable of and what they are for) and ii) that the pieces of cup came to possess exactly the nature and number of those of a cup before assembling. In short, such asymmetry is attributable to the relationship between temporal direction on the one hand and the implications of form and functional capacity on the other.
The application of these ideas of form and functional capacity only dictates temporal direction in relation to complex scenarios involving specific, non-metaphysical agency which is not merely dependent on human perception of time. However, this last observation in itself is not sufficient to invalidate the implications of the example for the progressive nature of time in general.
The second major family of solutions to this problem, and by far the one that has generated the most literature, finds the existence of the direction of time as relating to the nature of thermodynamics.
The answer from classical thermodynamics states that while our basic physical theory is, in fact, time-reversal symmetric, thermodynamics is not. In particular, the second law of thermodynamics states that the net entropy of a closed system never decreases, and this explains why we often see glass breaking, but not coming back together.
But in statistical mechanics things get more complicated. On one hand, statistical mechanics is far superior to classical thermodynamics, in that thermodynamic behavior, such as glass breaking, can be explained by the fundamental laws of physics paired with a statistical postulate. But statistical mechanics, unlike classical thermodynamics, is time-reversal symmetric. The second law of thermodynamics, as it arises in statistical mechanics, merely states that it is overwhelmingly likely that net entropy will increase, but it is not an absolute law.
Current thermodynamic solutions to the problem of the direction of time aim to find some further fact, or feature of the laws of nature to account for this discrepancy.
A third type of solution to the problem of the direction of time, although much less represented, argues that the laws are not time-reversal symmetric. For example, certain processes in quantum mechanics, relating to the weak nuclear force, are not time-reversible, keeping in mind that when dealing with quantum mechanics time-reversibility comprises a more complex definition. But this type of solution is insufficient because 1) the time-asymmetric phenomena in quantum mechanics are too few to account for the uniformity of macroscopic time-asymmetry and 2) it relies on the assumption that quantum mechanics is the final or correct description of physical processes.[citation needed]
One recent proponent of the laws solution is Tim Maudlin who argues that the fundamental laws of physics are laws of temporal evolution (see Maudlin [2007]). However, elsewhere Maudlin argues: "[the] passage of time is an intrinsic asymmetry in the temporal structure of the world... It is the asymmetry that grounds the distinction between sequences that runs from past to future and sequences which run from future to past" [ibid, 2010 edition, p. 108]. Thus it is arguably difficult to assess whether Maudlin is suggesting that the direction of time is a consequence of the laws or is itself primitive.
The problem of the flow of time, as it has been treated in analytic philosophy, owes its beginning to a paper written by J. M. E. McTaggart. In this paper McTaggart proposes two "temporal series". The first series, which means to account for our intuitions about temporal becoming, or the moving Now, is called the A-series. The A-series orders events according to their being in the past, present or future,simpliciter and in comparison to each other. The B-series eliminates all reference to the present, and the associated temporal modalities of past and future, and orders all events by the temporal relationsearlier than and later than.
McTaggart, in his paper "The Unreality of Time", argues that time is unreal since a) the A-series is inconsistent and b) the B-series alone cannot account for the nature of time as the A-series describes an essential feature of it.
Building from this framework, two camps of solution have been offered. The first, the A-theorist solution, takes becoming as the central feature of time, and tries to construct the B-series from the A-series by offering an account of how B-facts come to be out of A-facts. The second camp, the B-theorist solution, takes as decisive McTaggart's arguments against the A-series and tries to construct the A-series out of the B-series, for example, by temporal indexicals.
The Quantum field theory models have shown that it is possible for theories in two different spacetime backgrounds, like AdS/CFT or T-duality, to be equivalent.
Presentism & Eternalism
According to Presentism, time is an ordering of various realities. At a certain time some things exist and others do not. This is the only reality we can deal with and we cannot for example say that Homerexists because at the present time he does not. An Eternalist, on the other hand, holds that time is a dimension of reality on a par with the three spatial dimensions, and hence that all things—past, present, and future—can be said to be just as real as things in the present. According to this theory, then, Homer really does exist, though we must still use special language when talking about somebody who exists at a distant time—just as we would use special language when talking about something far away (the very words near, far, above, below, and such are directly comparable to phrases such as in the past, a minute ago, and so on).
Endurantism & Perdurantism
The positions on the persistence of objects are somewhat similar. An endurantist holds that for an object to persist through time is for it to exist completely at different times (each instance of existence we can regard as somehow separate from previous and future instances, though still numerically identical with them). A perdurantist on the other hand holds that for a thing to exist through time is for it to exist as a continuous reality, and that when we consider the thing as a whole we must consider an aggregate of all its "temporal parts" or instances of existing. Endurantism is seen as the conventional view and flows out of our pre-philosophical ideas (when I talk to somebody I think I am talking to that person as a complete object, and not just a part of a cross-temporal being), but perdurantists have attacked this position. (An example of a perdurantist is David Lewis.) One argument perdurantists use to state the superiority of their view is that perdurantism is able to take account of change in objects.
The relations between these two questions mean that on the whole Presentists are also endurantists and Eternalists are also perdurantists (and vice versa), but this is not a necessary connection and it is possible to claim, for instance, that time's passage indicates a series of ordered realities, but that objects within these realities somehow exist outside of the reality as a whole, even though the realities as wholes are not related. However, such positions are rarely adopted.
The relations between these two questions mean that on the whole Presentists are also endurantists and Eternalists are also perdurantists (and vice versa), but this is not a necessary connection and it is possible to claim, for instance, that time's passage indicates a series of ordered realities, but that objects within these realities somehow exist outside of the reality as a whole, even though the realities as wholes are not related. However, such positions are rarely adopted.
The Spiritual Journey Defined
|
Research foretells that that Spirituality from Life to Death is in fact a Spiritual Indoctrination process - of itself. Once realization is processed to be seen that all are similar, all are uniquely different, but are of inherited of the same Soul, only then would it be seen that Light & Darkness gives rise to Angel Code 421 is a balance structure that foretells that Interdependency exists, that there is a way to return to the Light seen through Reconciliation where Reckonation promotes stabilization other than to be seen as a hinderance to jest beliefs on Society that it can be seen to tell meaning to existences separately other than to fright on about Religious Propaganda & persuade that Equality can be determinable whither to do or try, being the same, just as Fate & Faith coexist through means necessary, just as anyone can have their own problems. Nothing is ever out of reach with Knowledge & Will.
|
Time Reckonation Is Not Meant To Disprove Belief
I understand greatly that Catholics are pushed to confess their Sins to their Church Leaders. Understand that my Theories, depictions, & beginning to why I've started Researching & Compiling this much is not to disown any, or all Religions. It is meant to determine stability that everything & everyone can become Coexistent, regardless of Religious Affiliation, but understanding that anyone can also lose Control. Just as there are multiple Heavens said to have existed through Interpretations, while others are founding Stability & belief without submitting to Research, no longer, to find that a Progressive Society exists namely because of backed Religious mistranslated Bibles that are surfacing to tell you that the World is actually backwards. Just as there can be new Electronics, while there can be Ancient Artifacts, whereas, the Artifacts can be seen as Real, or Fake, while the New Age describes that it really shouldn't matter, while others prattle to think it's nothing, when in fact, it is, & that based on Beliefs & Research can collapse Countries due to poor Community Involvement. Time Reckonation influentially determines that anyone can be seen Agnostic by a choice of free-will to venture only to find where they should belong, for God does not bring about Violence. My beliefs also show that whoever the People were that constructed the Dark Bible & the Evil Bible had given up too quickly without realizing the big picture here that everything compiled to be processed in the Brain, whither to be seen as B-Vitamins, correlates meaning to Vintage that brings about sensibility to Style, renewal, & prosperity. Whereas, what is new & old can be influenced to generate a broader means.
|
Evolution - Because Of HimTime Reckoner, is meant to correlate a clear meaning to arbitrary-resource-thinking in response to aid in ones' doing to help invoke promises to keep, not to be broken by individuals who actually do care. Not in the meaning to say that those who're in for a rude awakening are going to feel compromised, but in the form that Society needs to be advanced for the sole-purpose to help establish the concept to defining Reality in formation to Literature seen today, that can be applied to help motivate the individual to become more resourceful, re-desirable, & left to become more influent, not as a means to hurt, but to grow from. When you have Reckonation, it is meant to help aid in creative-thinking.
|
|
Creative ThinkingBelieve it or not, as a Sign, in Artistic formation, runs in the Glidden Bloodline. Just as most of the world's biggest Inventors were Gliddens that carried over to helping family's. Just as you have the first Typewriter, the Remington No. 1, produced by Carlos Glidden; Joseph Glidden, who patented the Barbed Wire in aiding the American West, or just as Sherwin-Williams & Edward Williams who invented the Glidden Paint Company.
Thus, you gain a clear message to what Original Equipment Manufacturing implies in artistic lineage to Counter Reformation. Whereas, one can simply congregate morality to become anomalous to helping those who are more sergeant to Mother Nature to those who simply want to verge; come-together. |
|
Denouncing SkepticismUnderstanding in one thing, when it comes down to Spiritualists & Spirituality, Spirituality relies in formation to Good & Negative Prospects. Those who commit to good to inspire, help, aid, & play nice, while others who choose to commit mutiny against all undefinable odds are merely all seen as tools to future involvement. War, clearly isn't an answer. It is a foreseeable forceable escape. Just as Folklore exists, to what level of the Supernatural can occur, others who treasure on behalf to Symbolic Congestive are clearly the informative' of the World, that are meant to cognate in effort to define from outsourcing material, from reference, to believably tell theory that defines, "what has been," in effort to define "Freedom."
|
|
Freedom Is Not ObsidianLiving Life Means. It is in fact the means to "wanting to live," that implies the necessity notationally describe this theory to be all & true. Freedom & Liberty are to be seen. Just as you have Liberty, you have Freedom. You have choice. Not just chance. You have an Alpha & Omega Concept that defines providence to the Living, not to the Non-Living. Just as you have Prayer, you have a means to record what is said, meant to reciprocate from, fix, & work from. Like a Resolution. A contrail meant to inspire verbal-thinking, meant to relate form of words, sources, written, thought, & portrayal. All to influence Creation from the Makers' Words to what People compiled as a whole can tangentially conspire.
|
|
The Spectrum To LifeTo what is visible, to what is to be seen. To what has been, to what cannot be seen. Despite extraordinary circumferences, there are studies, defining, Religious deferment, & human nature. Beings can be changed. Life can be explained, & form can be applied to define objectivity & purpose in coordinate to define good purpose, just as when the principles can be applied, there is coordination to Past, Present, & Future, that tells Time, to define Time, & to create a clear meaning that is not meant to define misunderstanding, although issues can occur, such as mistakes, time can be changed, just as mistakes can be renewed. Otherwise, trust becomes broken, & people move on; purposely, in effort to save the Mind & to renew broken Hearts. Color is more stronger today than you might think.
|
|
Coining The Anti-ChristThe meaning to Conflict is vast. A very deep diverging explanation to quell domestic integrity to apply in Crucification (Reciprocation, or to also be known as Reconciliation). Just as you have Artistic Reform, or Propaganda, lineage diversity exists for a reason. Believing to saying so, coining the Anti-Christ actually denounces negativity, actually savors all from racism in application to skin color, race, ethics, & so forth.
Research Conspires to Prayer Counseling |
|
Circulation Of FriendshipSonic The Hedgehog, not only a large populated established series over the coming years since its debut in the 90's, in comparison to Super Mario, has always been quite a repetitional source that ties into Metaphysics that explains possibility for Physics & Metaphysics to coexist, just you have Faith & Fate. Both can be cared to understand that the above relevance to Robotics are often seen in most fictional sourcing nowadays, such as video games. Even a Gaming System, just as the Xbox Kinect, or from Nintendo's earliest console, the Virtual Boy that drives a clear meaning to 2D, in development to 3D, such as to when the Dreamcast Era had finally came to be, which was well ahead over its time.
|