Knowing & Seeing is Believing, that's Life.
Given the circumstances that one wishes to decipher their Minds to be seen from a Past, Present & Future, generative, is a sensibility. It defines Control. Past, be your life experiences, just as Present defines who you are living as, be that Future defines what you'll become as to what isn't to be seen, because the Future just isn't to be seen. Past can be historical, often times defines background to what things in Reality have developed from. Just as Present defines what is to be seen today. Future be the ultimate goal. This defines in my theory to be what Business represents, as well. For the Past, be given as circumstance, there be Textbooks, Sources, Articles, Online Context Tools. Allowing the process for one to Learn. To go against Fatalism drives Schizophrenia. However, studies suggest that Autism & Schizophrenia are being treated as separate outcomes that are being labeled between Good VS Bad, but are ideally -- both mutual, but can be determined to tell that there are various interpretations to many things, such as Selfishness & Selfless, whereas, when someone just ideologically thinks they're just plain selfish is likely going to be a Stereotype. But because Schizophrenia backs into itself, describing a Person entrapped & lost in their Minds, Autism & Schizophrenia do not see eye-to-eye. The Good of Actions are seen to repel against negative actions on purpose, only to contradict one-another. It is like a battle between Positive & Negative Neutrons from the Flesh. Studies depict that Employment suffers, because Employees don't give-in to the fabrication of Past Context to spot the Present, that helps to predict the outcome of the Future, therefore explaining that beliefs contradict Science, when in fact, Science is backed by Human Nature, & given into the concept in the Bible that a piece of the Holy Spirit is apart of us, rests your case that when Mankind is seen as a whole, is ultimately being backed by a consensus group formation that defines the Holy Spirit, given that when all Minds connect to Come Together, they are being seen as Equals, being to what Prayer is seen to help distinguish & intensify the reason for belonging.
I guaranteed you that the reason why you have not seen an American Independent run for Office in Centuries is only because Economics & Government have deteriorated, just as Congress, & our Countries have, seen on Television, the Debt Clock; etc, is because due to Science, we are Mirroring everything. This is not the work of Satan. This is not the blaming of Gods. This is ourselves making matters worse. As a Christian, we are possibly born from Shadow, being the Truth, but for certain, we may not be God's intended Light, but anyone CAN be. There's so much doubt in this World today to even give simple explanation to who is or isn't Jesus Christ, just as there is so much to blame for the explanation to the Last Prophet, whither it be to determine that reformation to Christian Communities, but for certain, it is to be seen that there are no God's to be seen today to inhabit Thrones today. It doesn't mean that you should disprove that Jesus will come again from the Sky, for there can be various interpretations to determine how that'll fit, it's in the Future, & the Future isn't set in Stone. It just isn't, to know if this is True, but all you can simply do is believe, hope, & pray. There is really no need to doubt anyone. It's a known fact that when Fiction is compiled, it defines Spiritual Warfare. That doesn't mean you should become a Feral Chaos in Society.
My theories portray that the Satanic Star comes from Greek Mythology's Erebus as its Origin. The opposite of this darkness is Jesus Christ's word for Holy, defining a Parallel Conspiracy. Your fake Gods, are of mere shadow. In the contrary, Primeval Protogenoi Gods are separate deities, but in relation to what is being seen, they are as if to be seen as ONE.
Fatalism generally refers to any of the following ideas:
- The view that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do. Included in this is that man has no power to influence the future, or indeed, his own actions. This belief is very similar to predeterminism.
- An attitude of resignation in the face of some future event or events which are thought to be inevitable. Friedrich Nietzsche named this idea with "Turkish fatalism" in his book The Wanderer and His Shadow.
- That actions are free, but nevertheless work toward an inevitable end. This belief is very similar to compatibilist predestination.
- That acceptance is appropriate, rather than resistance against inevitability. This belief is very similar to defeatism.
Antiquity
Determinism, fatalism and predeterminism
Determinists generally agree that human actions affect the future but that human action is itself determined by a causal chain of prior events. Their view does not accentuate a "submission" to fate or destiny, whereasfatalists stress an acceptance of future events as inevitable. Determinists believe the future is fixed specifically due to causality; fatalists and predeterminists believe that some or all aspects of the future are inescapable, but not necessarily due to causality.
Fatalism is a looser term than determinism. The presence of historical "indeterminisms" or chances, i.e. events that could not be predicted by sole knowledge of other events, is an idea still compatible with fatalism. Necessity (such as a law of nature) will happen just as inevitably as a chance—both can be imagined as sovereign.
Likewise, determinism is a broader term than predeterminism. Predeterminists, as a specific type of determinists, believe that every single event or effect is caused by an uninterrupted chain of events that goes back to the origin of the universe. Determinists, holding a more generic view, meanwhile, believe that each event is at least caused by recent prior events, if not also by such far-extending and unbroken events as those going back in time to the universe's very origins.
Both fatalism and predeterminism, by referring to the personal "fate" or to "predetermined events" strongly imply the existence of a someone or something that has done the "predetermining." This is usually interpreted to mean a conscious, omniscient being or force who has personally planned—and therefore knows at all times—the exact succession of every event in the past, present, and future, none of which can be altered. One of the most famous theological interpretations of this idea is the Calvinist Christian notion of predestination, in which all occurring events have been already willed at the beginning of the universe by God. Contrarily, determinism does not usually imply the existence of such a supernatural being; many determinist models fall under scientific rather than religious or mystical philosophies.
The Idle Argument
- If it is fated for you to recover from this illness, then you will recover whether you call a doctor or not.
- Likewise, if you are fated not to recover, you will not do so whether you call a doctor or not.
- But either it is fated that you will recover from this illness, or it is fated that you will not recover.
- Therefore it is futile to consult a doctor.
Logical Fatalism and the Argument from Bivalence
The key idea of logical fatalism is that there is a body of true propositions (statements) about what is going to happen, and these are true regardless of when they are made. So, for example, if it is true today that tomorrow there will be a sea battle, then there cannot fail to be a sea battle tomorrow, since otherwise it would not be true today that such a battle will take place tomorrow.
The argument relies heavily on the principle of bivalence: the idea that any proposition is either true or false. As a result of this principle, if it is not false that there will be a sea battle, then it is true; there is no in-between. However, rejecting the principle of bivalence—perhaps by saying that the truth of a proposition regarding the future is indeterminate—is a controversial view since the principle is an accepted part of classical logic.
Another criticism of logical fatalism is that it assumes a timeless set of all propositions which exist without being proposed by anyone in particular. Constructivists (a school of thought in logic and mathematics) argue that this is not the case and that propositions only exist when they are constructed or expressed.
Criticisms
Another noteworthy criticism comes from the novelist David Foster Wallace, who in a 1985 paper "Richard Taylor's Fatalism and the Semantics of Physical Modality" suggests that Taylor reached his conclusion of fatalism only because his argument involved two different and inconsistent notions of impossibility. Wallace did not reject fatalism per se, as he wrote in his closing passage, "if Taylor and the fatalists want to force upon us a metaphysical conclusion, they must do metaphysics, not semantics. And this seems entirely appropriate." Willem deVries and Jay Garfield, both of whom were advisers on Wallace’s thesis, expressed regret that Wallace never published his argument. In 2010, the thesis was, however, published posthumously as Time, Fate, and Language: An Essay on Free Will.